The sale contract may or may not lead to an effective sale of the property in question. Some stamp tax laws, such as the Maharashtra Stamp Act, consider that an agreement to sell a property on the same basis as a proper transport record, as well as a proper transport record, are subject to the same stamp duty as the one in force for the proper sale of a property. Under these provisions, which require the payment of stamp duty on a sales contract, a sale agreement is wrongly considered a good act of sale. A deed of sale is a legal document that proves that the seller transferred absolute ownership of the property to the buyer. Through this document, the rights and interests of the property are acquired by the new owner. A deed of sale generally consists of the following information: “Any sales contract that is not a registered promotion (sales characteristics) would fall short of the requirements of paragraphs 54 and 55 of the Transfer of Ownership Act and would not confer ownership or transfer any right of dissemination to a property (with the exception of the limited right granted under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act).” In the future, a sale agreement is to be promised that the property will be transferred to the rightful owner, while the value of the sale is the actual transfer of the buyer`s property. “A contract for the sale of real estate is a contract to sell the property under the terms set by the parties,” Section 54. Section 54 adds: “It does not in itself create interest or royalty for such a property.” The Supreme Court also reaffirmed the importance of the contract of sale between the owner and the purchaser, since it recently decided that the period of awarding a dwelling unit to a home buyer should be taken into account from the date of the owner-buyer agreement and not from the date of registration of the project under the Real Estate Act (regulation and development). , 2016. The court also ordered the rera authorities to order the payment of compensation by the contractor, in accordance with the sales contract whose unsealability was upheld by this decision. The Supreme Court of India in 2012, in the case of Suraj Lamp – Industries (P) Ltd (2) v. Haryana State, while the examination of the validity of the sale of real estate by proxy, has done as a matter of under: In the event of the seller`s failure to sell or cede the property to the purchaser, the buyer obtains a right to the specific benefit, in accordance with the provisions of the Specific Relief Act of 1963. A similar right is available to the seller as part of the agreement to require a certain benefit from the buyer.